Tuesday
Oct132009

What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. . .or maybe not?

My family and I moved to Las Vegas from Cleveland in 1979, when Las Vegas was just this small town (pop. 165,000) with a big name. That same year Vegas had its second biggest winter storm in its history (with 7.4 inches of snow), three years earlier Elvis Presley performed his final engagement at the Hilton (dying nine months later of a drug overdose in Memphis, Tennessee) while at this time the mafia had been running Vegas for the last 30 years and had their hands deep into the pockets of the cities gambling industry; this being a part of the roots of its current moniker "sin city". 

Now with the ousting of the mob by the FBI during the early and mid 80's, in which hotels were then sold to legitimate business owners, Vegas was now moving in the direction of transforming itself. From the place where adults play, to a family vacation spot, to the entertainment capital of the world, Vegas knows how to constantly reinvent itself.

During the 80's and 90's, whether it was luxury magazines, newspapers or business news reports, Las Vegas was constantly in the top 10 list of  fastest growing cities in the country. This, in large part, was because of the hotel and gaming industry's "how do we re-imagine what the hotel experience is and push the envelope?" mentality.

As a result, this desert city has been the innovator in the hospitality industry for years. Whether it's the days of King Arthur re-created at the Excalibur Hotel or the the Big Apple re-interpreted as the New York, New York, imagination, creativity and hotels hold hands with one another in Las Vegas.

Now it seems that the innovative hotel experience that happens in Vegas, isn't just staying in Vegas anymore.  Steven J. Heyer, who heads Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, the third-largest hotel chain in the world, behind Best Western and Marriott is understanding the monumental shifts in today's market, (across the board) and is recognizing that hotels can be something more and/or different from what they've been before.

Thursday
Oct082009

Never underestimate the power of. . . (cont'd)

The phone call

(pt. 2)

A couple of weeks back I wrote this original post after being wowed by HubCast and the exemplary customer service that Jon gave within just one day of filling out some online forms for their company. Now I had randomly found HubCast by googling "booklet printers" so I didn't have a direct or personal connection to Jon or HubCast at all. But from day one Jon treated me like a good friend. 

Now my graphic designer (Graham Jackson. . . who is one of the most ferocious designers alive!) and I were putting together a media-arts booklet for my presentation at the Global Creative Economy Convergence Summit in Philly and we were pressed for time. We needed the book by Monday, the 5th of October, and the book had gone into production on the 2nd. Now Jon and his team came through like champions and actually overnighted it, and had it delivered to my house the next day!  Now what is remarkable is that the book was actually printed wrong (yikes!), but Jon and his team went dilegently to work (again) to rectify the problem first thing monday morning. AGAIN they overnighted it, but to my hotel in Philly, so that I would have my materials for my presentation on Tuesday afternoon. 

Additionally the book came out beautifully and impressed many of the audience memebers at the event. If you ever, ever, ever need printing done PLEASE go to HubCast! I'll definitely be using them in the future!  Below are some images of our marketing-arts booklet which covers our Seven Principles of Convergence

 

Friday
Oct022009

'Original' Gangsta'

When it comes to discussions on creativity and business there's no person I'd rather talk to into the wee hours of the night with than my good friend Rakiyt Zakari. Her ideas on fashion, design and trends are about as good as they come. If you don't know about her work check her out. Ladies and Gents, Ms. Zakari. . .

1. Hey Rakiyt we've know and worked with each other for over a year and a half now, but for Threshold readers who aren't familiar with your work give them some insight - What's the 'Original David' brand about?

The Original David is about interpreting cultures in our own sarcastic way. Heightening and often poking fun at our differences through nostalgic and familiar references. There is an emotional connection that the Original David evokes. David symbolizes an iconic mentality.  The goal is to provide intelligent design that sparks dialogue, and builds bridges between ideas and aesthetics whose coexistence is unconventional. 

2. Before we actually start pushing further with more insight into what the Original David is about why did you decide to create and push this fashion idea/concept?

The Original David as a concept is about inclusion. My son's name is David and he (in my opinion) is the quintessential boy. He likes to draw, play, rough house, imagine he's in real life karate battles. . .that sort of thing. Like most kids he holds an unbiased honesty in his opinion and the way he sees people; a new friend is a new friend regardless of their hair, dress, accent, etc. This idea of simplistic acceptance was the foundation of the Original David, but also I noticed an annoying trend toward political correctness that was making it hard for people to understand that though we're all the same, we're different and that's okay.  My idea was to take all of those things and passively display my opinion on the matter in a way that was a little controversial but still approachable.

3. When you see the Original David pieces either being worn by your fans or in fashion magazines there is no mistaking it. In your own words what makes the Original David pieces "original?"

Aesthetic and subject. The designs themselves brand the line. I may take a familiar subject but apply The Original David characters in a way that so infuses David with said subject that I create it's own identity.  Every piece is hand made, which is another difference between the high turnover, mass production driven fashion industry.  T-shirts are common because everybody wears them. They may be the must humble article of clothing, but my approach is to make it a piece that people will value. Artists paint on canvas, it's not the surface that makes the art, it's the artist's skill, their message, and the entire composition, that makes it valuable and appealing.  Graffiti artists have concrete, chef's have plates. . .regardless of the frame the proof is in the pudding.

4. People are and always will be enamored with the world of fashion. It's creative, it's sexy, it's chic. But there is always the "untold story."  What's the biggest misconception about the 'design world' from your perspective?

The untold story is that this is hard work and for many of us its a very vulnerable existence. In an office you don't get fired if you don't highlight and embolden your spreadsheet properly.  In this industry though, it's up to you to tow the line between being creative and also marketable. Sometimes as artists it's hard to deal with rejection.  For many of us the personal connection between our work and ourselves is so great that a dismissal of our work is a dismissal of a part of us.  I think that focused creativity may be the hardest task for some of us to master.

The Fashion industry draws in people that are looking for a certain lifestyle, and while that life can be fun, sexy and very exciting, that all comes at a price. You have to have a real job. Fashion is a real job.  This point is something I think people tend to forget.  It's a multi-billion dollar industry that drives whole communities for entire countries, manufacturing significantly effects their economies. These are the sides of the industry not draped in chiffon and champagne, it is the reality behind fashion and apparel.  

5. Now if my memory serves me correct Tim Gunn of Project Runway and Andre Leon Talley (fashion icon and editor-at-large of Vogue magazine) are fans of the Original David. How did that happen?

I met Tim during my failed Project Runway tryout. He and a panel including Daniel Vosovic from Project Runway were reviewing my dresses, and weren't particularly impressed. . .but what they all agreed on was that they loved the shirt I was wearing. They advised me to take it to the next level. This was around 2005. 

I had previously met Andre at a a book signing in Washington DC.  He is extremely witty and does not mince words when professing his like or dislike for your fashion choices. Lucky for me he liked my shoes. Then I met him again at this event and was responsible for taking pictures of the models before the show and had looked down at my camera, then back at him, I was like "What? Ooooh, man I don't want to take your picture, I want to give you shirt." When he saw the shirt he was like "OOH LET'S TAKE PICTURES!!" Anyway he said he loved it and wanted my information to contact me.

6. In the market place social media is all the rave and everyone is talking about how to leverage online networks like Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter for marketing purposes. What's your opinion on this? 

I think that all of these mediums play support to tried and true marketing principles. The medium may be different but if you have a mundane, uninteresting message, service or product - over saturating social media with mediocrity will not give it legs.  I feel that used properly these networks can help give you quick visibility to a large community.  The instant access and virtual nature of these mediums also shortens the life of products. The public's attention span is down to milliseconds. I think there is a direct correlation between this attention deficit and the social networking phenomena. Of Linkedin, Facebook and Twitter, I would probably rank them in this order of usefulness. 

  • 1. Linkedin- great for self promotion and company research
  • 2. Facebook - good for creating a community around a brand
  • 3. Twitter. . . . "ummm" Not for business

7.  You've been in the game for years now.  What one piece of advice would you give newcomers trying to make their mark in the fashion world.

“Do something else! There’s enough competition out there already without all you fresh creative hot rods throwing your ballot into the mix!!” Seriously, I advise that they have an understanding of business as well as fashion. It is important to know what’s going on in the business world, because it let’s you know who you’re up against and how to stay abreast of what’s going on in competing industries. Fashion is a great field in that it can cross over into many other industries, so just knowing what’s going on between the pages of Vogue, isn’t going to cut it any more. I would also say to designers, be original, realistic, and make sure you have tough skin… it may be a monogrammed Louis Vuitton vintage leather tough skin, but you’re going to need it.

Wednesday
Sep302009

The art of "creative ideas"

One of my favorite business books of all time is a Whole New Mind -  by Daniel Pink.  His premise is that right brain thinking will rule the future. It's an incredible book and if you haven't read it. . .read it now.

Some quick background infomation on right brain thinking:

The right brain functions in a non-verbal manner and excels in visual, spatial, perceptual, and intuitive information. The right brain, processing happens very quickly and the style of processing is nonlinear and non sequential. The right brain looks at the whole picture and quickly seeks to determine the spatial relationships of all the parts as they relate to the whole. This component of the brain is not concerned with things falling into patterns because of prescribed rules. On the contrary, the right brain seems to flourish dealing with complexity, ambiguity and paradox. At times, right brain thinking is difficult to put into words because of its complexity, its ability to process information quickly and its non-verbal nature. The right brain has been associated with the realm of creativity.

Now about a week ago my good friend Jeremy Epstein, who's client is Dan Pink, organized a very cool "field trip" for some close colleagues of his (in which I attended) to the National Gallery of Arts here in DC. 

The morning trip was broken up into three parts:

  1. Spend 45 minutes investigating a piece of art and use the guidelines of the Harvard Artful Thinking Palette (an awesome tool for the trip suggested by Jeremy's friend, Liz Diament, Museum Educator at NGA).
  2. Reconvene with the rest of the group to share your photos of the work you selected and what you learned/observed.
  3. Get some lunch and have a free flowing discussion about fostering and driving innovation with Venkatesh, who leads one of the Innovation groups at Xerox.

A very cool trip indeed. You can read Jeremy's post on it here.

The lesson for the day: The paradigm of staying in your office the whole day is a remnant of the left-brain, industrial age. You MUST get to places that will change your perspective, engage your right brain, and challenge you to think creatively (well said Jeremy!).

So in the spirit of creative art to stimulate your thinking I present to you. . .

Parks on Fire

Tuesday
Sep292009

Innovation is dead

It's now all about. . .

This is the claim that Umair Haque, Director of Havas Media Lab, makes in a recent article he wrote for Harvard Business Publishing entitled, the The Awesomeness Manifesto

His hypothesis is that awesomeness is the new innovation.

Hmmm. . .interesting.

Haque posits that "innovation" is a relic of the industial era and that we should be innovating innovation. Why? Because when we examine the economics of innovation, three reasons emerge.

  • Innovation relies on obsolescence. 
  • Innovation dries up our seedcorn.
  • Innovation often isn't.

As an alternative to the present decrepit state of innovation (as Umair proposes) he prefers a better concept, one built for a radically interdependent 21st century: awesomeness.  And here are their four pillars:

  1. Ethical production.
  2. Insanely great stuff
  3. Love
  4. Thick value

 After reading the whole article you'll see that there are 67 comments to Umair's idea.  Some agree and love his idea while others strongly disagree. For me I see the merits of both sides of the commentors' arguments. 

For me though what the real pot of gold is with Umair's article is that he makes a radical assertion: Innovation is dead (and he then proceeds to outline his argument). In today's market (as I've said on a numerous occasions) true value is in radical differentiation.  Now whether it's called innovation or awesomeness is up for debate (as Umair has just put into motion). 

For a long time now the "masters of the universe" have sauntered along claiming "value" in their products when there really was none and ringing the bells of "benefits to the customer" when truly none existed.  The winners of the new market space will be those who are truly fearless and will step out on a limb and recalibrate the DNA of their thinking and truly begin creating real value, real benefits and real impact with their products and services in the market. Creating awesome innovation in the process.